Module 6 · Topic 7
This topic links three ideas. The Contracts Act 1950 decides when an agreement is a binding contract and what happens when it goes wrong. The same Act's agency rules, backed by the CMSA and the Rules of Bursa Malaysia Securities, set what a stockbroking company owes its client and what it may do when the client does not pay. The tort of negligent misstatement, plus statutory liability under the CMSA, covers careless advice and false documents. Expect short scenarios: a posted acceptance, a disobeyed price limit, a third party phoning in an order, a raid on the trust account.
8 min read6 sections
Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136, AGC reprint text); Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (Act 671, SC consolidated text incorporating amendments in force 1 January 2026) ss.90-97, 108, 111-115; Rules of Bursa Malaysia Securities Chapter 5 (as at 30 June 2021), Chapter 7 (as at 21 November 2024), Chapters 9 and 10, and Participating Organisations' Directives and Guidance (as at 9 July 2026), Directives No. 5-001 and 5.15-001, read on bursamalaysia.com; Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465; Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605. Checked 12 October 2026. As at October 2026. Independent prep, not endorsed by SIDC or the SC.
Under s.10 of the Contracts Act 1950, agreements are contracts if made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object. Writing is not required unless a statute says so.
Matching orders on Bursa's trading system creates a binding contract on the terms of the matched orders, governed by the Rules.
Trap: Letting the proposer revoke after the acceptance is posted. Once posted, acceptance is complete against him, so his revocation comes too late.
Takeaway: Free consent, capacity, consideration, lawful object; acceptance by post binds the proposer the moment it is posted.
| Defect | Effect | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation | Voidable at the option of the party whose consent was caused | ss.14-20 |
Every note. Every question. One pass.
4 more sections of this note are part of Premium.
From ≈RM16.58/mo on the Until-you-pass pass (12 months)
| Both parties mistaken on an essential fact | Void | s.21 |
| Mistake as to Malaysian law | Not voidable | s.22 |
| Unlawful consideration or object | Void | s.24 |
| Restraint of trade or profession | Void, subject to the exceptions | s.28 |
| Wagers | Void | s.31 |
Remedies: damages for loss arising naturally in the usual course of things or that the parties knew was likely, not remote or indirect loss (s.74); where a sum is named for breach, reasonable compensation up to that sum (s.75).
Trap: Calling an honest but unfounded statement 'fraud'. It is misrepresentation, still making the contract voidable.
Takeaway: Defective consent makes a contract voidable; illegality, shared mistake of fact and wagers make it void.